Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6
alaAverage 4.1

38 recensioni

11/2024

alaTest ha raccolto ed analizzato 38 recensioni su Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6. La media della valutazione per questo prodotto è 4.1/5, confrontata con la media della valutazione di 4.4/5 per altri prodotti.

In media, gli clienti valutano questo prodotto 81/100.

Analisi recensione

(Basato su 38 recensioni)

3 recensioni esperti

Recensioni Utente  

Disclaimer:

Di seguito è riportato un elenco di recensioni per questo o prodotti simili. Se pensi che questo raggruppamento è sbagliato, fare clic qui per bandiera.
Per saperne di più sulla nostra pagina delle FAQ.
Visualizza 1 - 34 di 38 Visualizza Recensioni: in Italia | tutte le recensioni

Recensione utente (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 23 user reviews of Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.3/5 for other products in the same category on Amazon.com.

100% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

11/2024

Recensione utente (amazon.de)

Zusammenfassung der Amazon.de- Kundenbewertungen für Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

 

alaTest hat 1 Kundenbewertungen für Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6 von Amazon.de zusammengefasst und analysiert. Im Durchschnitt wurde das Produkt mit 4.0/5 bewertet, verglichen mit einer durchschnittlichen Bewertung von 4.3/5 für andere Produkte auf Amazon.de.

100% der Kundenmeinungen auf Amazon.de bewerten dieses Produkt positiv.

Questo riassunto è basato sui prodotti: Sigma 28-200/3,5-5,6 DG Nikon-AF MacroSigma 28-200/3,5-5,6 DG Nikon-AF Macro

11/2024

Recensione esperto da (ephotozine.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro

 

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro test

Good focal range; Compact and lightweight to carry; Excellent performance through the range; Cracking value for money

Distrotion just evident

07/2006

Recensione esperto da : Peter K. Burian (shutterbug.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DL Aspherical Macro & 17-35mm f/2.8-f/4 EX

 

While a "fast" zoom lens like the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.

Recensione esperto da : photodo.com (photodo.com)

REVIEW: Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro

 

This lens is nicely compact for it's capabilities although it does extend somewhat as you zoom to the long end of the range. The extension, achieved by a double trombone, comes out some 52mm. It does so with quite a smooth action though and the second...

Good focal range; Compact and lightweight to carry; Excellent performance through the range; Cracking value for money

CA around the edges at the wider end; Distrotion just evident

If you need a general purpose lens to carry on your camera, and use the long end as much as the wide, then this offering is well worth a look. The excellent resolution figures achieved through the middle to the long end are a pleasant surprise and make...

Recensione utente (photographyreview.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens

 

Lots of verbiage about lens comparisons, most of which neglect the primary issue - does the lens deliver, consistently, a clear, sharp image. This lens certainly does - through Europe, Asia, USA, S.A. A marvel of optical engineering. I compared this...

Sharp, light, responsive

Manual focus - need to adjust eye for the split image

06/2009

Recensione utente (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro review by eyrieowl

 

This was my first lens for my Nikon d50. Which was my first true digital camera (other than 3mp point-and-shoot i'd gotten with my printer). prior to that, i'd been shooting on a venerable Canon AE-1. I had a cheapie 28-210 zoom on that body (no, I...

wide range, relatively compact, macro functionality, price

slow, not very sharp, doesn't go wide-enough on aps sensor, color cast

08/2007

Recensione utente (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by trentdp

 

I actually owned an older version of this lens under the Quantary brand from Ritz Camera. I originally bought it for use on my Nikon N60 but was never really excited by the pictures. I used it again during July 2006 on my D70 while on vacation and...

Cheap price for long zoom

Just so-so performance

01/2007

Recensione utente (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by awalker

 

It's a good travel lens for a FF film EOS (the reason I bought it) and it's just about OK with a 20D if you need the FL range and can only carry one lens. Wouldn't pay more than $120 these days, though, and there are better lenses out there.

Price, build quality

Noisy AF, image quality

11/2006

Recensione utente (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by nspur

 

This is the latest incarnation of Sigma's popular 7x zoom for film cameras (and full frame digital too, perhaps). It's a "twin" of the well-thought-of 18-125 for DX digital cameras and has much the same characteristics.

A nice little travel lens, better than you might think

Flare at w/a, auto-focus a little tricky

11/2005

Recensione utente (slrgear.com)

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical IF Macro review by Allan

 

I'm new to dSLR so you have to take my review with a grain of salt. I wanted a cheap lens to play with, and for under $100 on ebay (new) I don't think I could have done better than this lens. Outside, with plenty of light, this lens performs well; it...

Light, cheap

Stiff zoon ring, poor low light focus

11/2005

Recensione utente (ceneo.pl)

Szczerze odradzam!!!

 

Nie wazne czy jesteś amatorem czy starym wyjadaczem, jakość zdjęć z tego obiektywu napewno cię nie zadowoli.Obiektyw ten jest tani i moze cię skusić niska cena, ale dobrze Ci radzę nie kupuj go!!!ZDJĘCIA Z TEGO OBIEKTYWU SĄ MYDLANE I ROZMAZANE W...

cena

słabość konstrukcji

08/2009
1
2

Confronto prezzo per Sigma C 28-200/3.5-5.6

Non ci sono prezzi per questo prodotto