AKG K92

alaTest ha raccolto ed analizzato 9 recensioni su AKG K92. La media della valutazione per questo prodotto è 4.6/5, confrontata con la media della valutazione di 4.0/5 per altri Cuffie. Le persone sono impressionate da design e usabilità. In aggiunta, comfort e qualità suono ottengono buone opinioni. Ci sono alcuni commenti comuni circa qualità fabbricazione.

prezzo, qualità suono, comfort, usabilità, design

Abbiamo analizzato differenti valutazioni di esperti ed utenti, età del prodotto ed altri elementi. A confronto con altri Cuffie, AKG K92 ha ottenuto un alaScore™ complessivo di 93/100 = qualità Eccellente.

Analisi recensione

(Basato su 9 recensioni)

Recensioni Esperto  

Recensioni Utente  

Visualizzate 9 recensione/i

Recensioni Esperto Recensioni Utente

Disclaimer:

Di seguito è riportato un elenco di recensioni per questo o prodotti simili. Se pensi che questo raggruppamento è sbagliato, fare clic qui per bandiera.
Per saperne di più sulla nostra pagina delle FAQ.
Visualizza 1 - 9 di 9 Visualizza Recensioni: in Italia | tutte le recensioni

Recensione esperto da: (techradar.com)

AKG K92 review

 

Great sound quality in a budget housing

They may not feel like a premium pair of cans, but the sound quality of the K92s more than make up for the plastic exterior.

06/2016

Recensione esperto da: (stuff.tv)

AKG K92 headphones review

 

The new gold standard for affordable on-ear headphones

Stellar sound that's smooth and detailed ; Built to last, but comfy too ; Brilliant value

At this price? Nothing

AKG strikes gold: this pair of cans has a real shout for 2016's best value headphones

11/2016

Recensione esperto da: What Hi-Fi? (whathifi.com)

AKG K92 review

 

AKG strikes gold with these great value headphones

Smooth, enjoyable sound ; Plenty of detail, clarity and fluid dynamics ; Great rhythmic ability ; Good build ; Comfortable ; Excellent value

Nothing at this price

AKG has struck gold – the K92s might just be the best value headphones we’ve heard this year

08/2016

Recensione esperto da: (stuff.tv_in)

AKG K92 headphones review

 

The new gold standard for affordable on-ear headphones

Stellar sound that's smooth and detailed ; Built to last, but comfy too ; Brilliant value

At this price? Nothing

AKG strikes gold: this pair of cans has a real shout for 2016's best value headphones

11/2016

Recensione utente da: AL1000 (richersounds.com)

Ok for the price

 

Cannot really recommend this particular model as one of the ear cushions which are actually glued in place came off so regarding build quality they're not very good. But they sound ok for the price, so I may have to return them for a relacement.

sound

poor build

05/2017

Recensione utente da: Swiss (richersounds.com)

Value and Quality together.

 

Time came to replace my beloved old comfortable Technics and these match them. The sound quality is excellent for such a 'value for money' set and they are comfortable after 2 hours use, not to tight, a nice snug fit and a nice long lead. And for...

courtesy

rudeness

05/2017

Recensione utente da: PChilli (richersounds.com)

Great value

 

I was looking for some headphones to plug into a guitar amp and these are perfect. A long lead and very comfortable over glasses. Sound good too and for under £50 a great deal. Recommended by a member of staff so thanks for that. Spot on.

04/2017

Recensione utente da: Anynamewilldo (richersounds.com)

Great Service and Value

 

Great value for money. They're replacing a set of Sennheisers that were a lot more expensive when purchased and I'm very happy with them. The sound and comfort are good, plus they cut out a lot more of the ambient sound than the Sennheiesers did.

cut out lots of background noise.

can't adjust the fit.

04/2017

Recensione utente da: Mason (richersounds.com)

Impressive headphones

 

These were recommended by Will at the Cambridge branch, and with good reason -- they are comfortable and deliver excellent sound, and at a very reasonable price. They also have a decent cable length of 3m.

sound quality comfort cable length

none

04/2017